The U.S. criticized “the breadth” of the highest U.N. courtroom’s opinion that Israel‘s occupation of Palestinian territories is illegitimate, with Washington saying it might complicate efforts to resolve the battle.
“We have been clear that Israel‘s program of government support for settlements is both inconsistent with international law and obstructs the cause of peace,” a U.S. State Department spokesperson stated on Saturday in an e-mail.
“However, we are concerned that the breadth of the court’s opinion will complicate efforts to resolve the conflict,” the State Department added.
The International Court of Justice, or the World Court, stated on Friday that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements was unlawful and needs to be ended as quickly as doable, delivering its strongest findings to this point on the Israeli-Palestinian battle.
The State Department stated the ICJ opinion that Israel should withdraw as quickly as doable from the Palestinian territories was “inconsistent with the established framework” for resolving the battle.
Washington stated that framework took under consideration Israel’s safety wants, which it says have been highlighted by the Oct. 7 assaults on Israel by Palestinian resistance group Hamas. Those assaults killed 1,200, with round 250 individuals taken as hostages, in line with Israeli tallies.
TWO-STATE SOLUTION
The advisory opinion by ICJ judges isn’t binding however carries weight underneath worldwide legislation and should weaken help for Israel.
The State Department stated the way in which ahead was by direct negotiations.
“Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the regime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law,” ICJ President Nawaf Salam stated on Friday whereas studying the findings of a 15-judge panel.
The courtroom stated Israel’s obligations embrace paying restitution for hurt and “the evacuation of all settlers from existing settlements”.
Israel rejected the opinion and stated a political settlement can solely be reached by negotiations. The workplace of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas welcomed the opinion, which it known as historic.
The State Department stated it “strongly discourages” events from utilizing the ICJ opinion “as a pretext for further unilateral actions that deepen divisions or for supplanting a negotiated two-state solution.”
The ICJ case stems from a 2022 request for a authorized opinion from the United Nations General Assembly. It predates Israel’s warfare in Gaza, which started after the Oct. 7 assaults and has killed virtually 39,000, in line with the well being ministry in Gaza, which has been underneath Hamas rule, whereas inflicting a starvation disaster, displacing Gaza’s practically complete 2.3 million individuals and spurring genocide allegations that Israel denies.
The ICJ opinion stated the U.N. Security Council, the General Assembly and all states have an obligation to not acknowledge the occupation as authorized nor “render aid or assistance” towards sustaining Israel’s presence within the Palestinian territories.
Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem – which the Palestinians need for a state – within the Six-Day War in 1967 and has since constructed and expanded settlements within the West Bank.
Source: www.anews.com.tr