Almost half 1,000,000 euros are in play. Lilly Becker and Pierre Uebelhack are preventing in court docket over some huge cash. But that’s not all.
For Lilly Becker it’s about lots for the time being, not nearly cash. What occurred on Wednesday earlier than the 14th Civil Chamber on the Munich Regional Court raised many questions. It was the beginning of proceedings wherein “mainly a payment amounting to 182,694 euros” was claimed – by the TV producer Pierre Uebelhack. He calls for this a reimbursement from Lilly Becker; she solely obtained it from him as a mortgage, however regardless of all his requests, she by no means paid it again.
The proven fact that this case ended up in court docket can be unlucky sufficient in itself. But it didn’t cease. In the oral listening to on Wednesday, the only decide acknowledged “that the parties are probably also arguing about other payment amounts amounting to around 300,000 euros,” the court docket confirmed to t-online. Although this isn’t the topic of the proceedings, it definitely appears unsavory.
In any case, Lilly Becker denies all allegations by her lawyer. Her model: The cash was not a mortgage, however fairly a present as a result of she and Pierre Uebelhack had been a pair. Between autumn 2018 and the start of 2021, as a pair, they “shared a table and bed,” as “Bild,” amongst others, quoted from the accused’s argument.
Uebelhack, alternatively, denies this. He desires the monetary donations again and introduced the signed mortgage agreements to the court docket. These paperwork, in flip, had been “foisted” on her consumer, in response to Lilly Becker’s lawyer. These fully contradictory statements in the end led to the presiding decide, Judge Robert Engelmann, clearly admonishing each events.
Are Lilly Becker or Pierre Uebelhack even threatened with a jail sentence?
“In view of the very different presentations of the parties,” there’s additionally “the possibility of criminal offenses being committed,” a spokeswoman for the regional court docket wrote to t-online when requested. It is explicitly about course of fraud. This happens “when a party presents untrue facts to the court and the court, based on this, makes a judgment that sentences the other party to pay,” explains the press spokeswoman and provides: “If the court recognizes the untruth, it does not If the ‘desired’ payment judgment is reached, a consciously untruthful presentation would constitute an attempt at process fraud.”
So it’s about rather more than cash. Now the case additionally revolves round who lied in court docket. Because the 2 variations are so contradictory that one of many two events is mendacity. This prompted the decide to talk of a “serious crime”. However, this isn’t outlined within the legislation. So what did Robert Engelmann imply by that?
An settlement should be reached by April 2, 2024
“The single judge expressed that lying in court is not a trivial offense. The penalty for fraud is a fine or a prison sentence of up to 5 years (§ 263 StGB),” stated Cornelia Kallert, presiding decide on the regional court docket , to t-online.
How issues proceed now can be within the fingers of Lilly Becker and Pierre Uebelhack. The decide requested the disputants to achieve an settlement. He gave them till April 2, 2024 to do that. If that isn’t sufficient and the 2 nonetheless can’t agree on their attorneys, the negotiation will go into the subsequent spherical. The subsequent date for the process can be April tenth.
Source: www.nationalturk.com