Published December 03,2024
Subscribe
The 2nd Symposium on News Copyright and Artificial Intelligence in Media convened Monday at Bogazici University in Istanbul, bringing collectively outstanding specialists to debate the authorized and moral challenges posed by rising applied sciences within the media sector.
Organized by Anadolu and Bogazici University with the backing of the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism, the symposium explored the intersection of digital transformation, synthetic intelligence and copyright regulation in news manufacturing.
During the primary session, specialists examined international efforts to replace copyright laws in response to technological developments.
Amid ongoing discussions on the European Court of Justice relating to Facebook proprietor Meta‘s authorized problem, individuals emphasised the crucial position of strong authorized frameworks and constant enforcement in upholding high quality journalism within the digital age.
-GERMANY, ITALY’S EXPERIENCES ON NEWS COPYRIGHT
Valentina Moscon, Senior Research Fellow for Intellectual Property and Competition Law on the Max Planck Institute, careworn the significance of structured protections for press publishers in Europe.
“The introduction of this formal protection of press publishing in Europe has become necessary as a consequence of the growing power of some tech giants and the development of new business models, which have disrupted press publishers’ traditional ways to monetize and enforce their rights,” Moscon mentioned throughout her tackle on the first session.
She additionally highlighted the EU’s directive geared toward preserving a “free and pluralistic press,” making certain honest compensation for publishers and addressing the fragmentation of authorized frameworks throughout its 27 member states.
“Germany, one of the first countries to implement the directive, followed a text-aligned approach, emphasizing that facts are not protected by copyright, consistent with international conventions,” she famous.
While the directive seeks to harmonize authorized practices, Moscon identified persistent challenges, significantly in distinguishing between content material protected by copyright and rights granted to press publishers.
“This reform reflects the need to adapt to evolving digital realities while balancing the interests of authors, publishers and society at large, but its effectiveness depends on consistent interpretation and enforcement across the EU,” she added.
Later, Giulia Li Greci, authorized director at Italian news company ANSA, shared insights on Italy’s adoption of the EU’s ESCAN Directive by means of the DGZ decree.
The directive goals to make sure honest income distribution for press publications used on-line, in keeping with Li Greci.
“Article 15 of the ESCAN Directive provides publishers with exclusive rights for the online use of their works by service providers,” she mentioned.
Li Greci elaborated on Italy’s measures for equitable compensation.
“AGCOM is tasked with defining reference criteria to ensure fair compensation, including factors like the number of journalists employed, years of activity and market relevance,” she mentioned.
She famous that negotiations between publishers and repair suppliers are obligatory, with unresolved disputes referred to judges who depend on AGCOM’s standards for choices.
Li Greci additionally mentioned a authorized dispute when Meta contested AGCOM’s laws, arguing they imposed obligations exceeding the directive’s intent and granted undue authority to administrative our bodies.
“The Council of State ruled that Meta’s objections were not justified, reinstating AGCOM’s regulation and affirming its role in ensuring fairness for publishers,” she added, emphasizing the directive’s authorized robustness.
Source: www.anews.com.tr