Published November 11,2024
Subscribe
The NATO defence alliance continues to have a navy benefit over Russia, regardless of a rearmament underneath President Vladimir Putin, in accordance with a examine commissioned by Greenpeace revealed on Monday.
An evaluation of the navy capabilities of the Western alliance and Russia “leaves no doubt about NATO’s overall military superiority. Only in terms of nuclear weapons do the two sides have parity, concluded Herbert Wulf and Christopher Steinmetz, the study’s authors.
Information from their study does not “justify the necessity for an extra and everlasting enhance in navy spending in Germany,” the authors wrote, adding that a “logical consequence” of a better navy funds could be cuts to social providers, training or local weather safety measures.
For the examine, Wulf and Steinmetz in contrast the navy potential of NATO and Russia on the premise of six central parameters, together with navy spending.
They discovered that NATO international locations mixed at the moment spend 10 occasions as a lot on their armed forces as Russia ($1.19 trillion vs. $127 billion). Even eradicating US spending and making an allowance for variations in buying energy, NATO nonetheless has a major benefit ($430 billion vs. $300 billion).
NATO additionally has a major edge with regards to main weapons programs, with members of the defence alliance counting a mixed 5,406 fight plane (together with 2,073 in Europe) in comparison with Russia’s 1,026. Only with regards to strategic bombers does Russia virtually attain parity with the United States (129 to 140), the examine says.
Russia is lagging behind NATO in lots of areas of weaponry, and it is unlikely it will have the ability to catch up in lower than a decade, the authors say, including that the defence alliance additionally has a bigger variety of troopers underneath arms in addition to a deeper reservoir of reservists.
Source: www.anews.com.tr